Skip to main content

Greedy / Lazy Quantifiers

Regular Expressions: Greedy / Lazy Quantifiers



What is a lazy quantifier in regex?

View Answer:
Interview Response: A lazy quantifier in regex, symbolized as '?' following a quantifier, tries to match as little text as possible. For example, '.*?' will match the shortest possible string, contrary to the greedy '.*'.

Code Example:

Here is an example of using lazy and greedy quantifiers in JavaScript:

let str = '<div>hello</div><div>world</div>';

// greedy
let greedyResult = str.match(/<div>.*<\/div>/)[0];
console.log(greedyResult); // '<div>hello</div><div>world</div>'

// lazy
let lazyResult = str.match(/<div>.*?<\/div>/)[0];
console.log(lazyResult); // '<div>hello</div>'

In the greedy example, the '.' matches as much as it can, including the closing '</div>' of the first div and the opening '<div>' of the second. In contrast, the lazy '.?' in the second example stops matching as soon as it encounters the first '</div>'.


Can you explain the difference between greedy and lazy quantifiers?

View Answer:
Interview Response: Greedy quantifiers match as much as possible, while lazy quantifiers match as little as possible. They control how many instances a regular expression matches in a given input.

Technical Response: Quantifiers are Greedy by default. Greedy quantifiers seek the longest text that meets a particular pattern. Greedy quantifiers scan the whole string before attempting any match. If the full text does not match, delete the last character and try again until a match gets discovered. A lazy (also known as non-greedy or hesitant) quantifier always tries to repeat the sub-pattern as few times as feasible before expanding to longer matches. In general, a lazy pattern matches the smallest feasible string. To make quantifiers lazy, attach (?) to the current quantifier, for example, +?, {0,5}? We should emphasize that lazy quantifiers are capable of failing.

The notion of greedy/lazy quantifiers only exists in backtracking regex engines. In non-backtracking regex engines or POSIX-compliant regex engines, quantifiers only specify the repetition's upper and lower bound without specifying how to find the match.

Code Example:

// Greedy Quantifier
let regexp = /".+"/g;
let str = 'a "witch" and her "broom" is one';
console.log(str.match(regexp)); // "witch" and her "broom"

// Lazy Quantifier
let regexp = /".+?"/g;
let str = 'a "witch" and her "broom" is one';

console.log(str.match(regexp)); // "witch", "broom"

How do you make a greedy quantifier lazy?

View Answer:
Interview Response: You make a greedy quantifier lazy in a regular expression by appending a question mark (?) to it. For example, '*' becomes '*?', '+' becomes '+?', and '{n,}' becomes '{n}?'.

Code Example:

Sure, here is a JavaScript code example illustrating the difference between greedy and lazy quantifiers:

let str = '1234567890';

// greedy
let greedyResult = str.match(/\d{3,}/)[0];
console.log(greedyResult); // '1234567890'

// lazy
let lazyResult = str.match(/\d{3,}?/)[0];
console.log(lazyResult); // '123'

In the greedy example, '\d{3,}' matches as many digit characters as possible (3 or more), so it returns the entire string. In contrast, the lazy '\d{3,}?' returns as soon as it finds the minimum number of matches (3 digits).


What are the effects of a lazy quantifier on regex performance?

View Answer:
Interview Response: Lazy quantifiers can negatively affect regex performance as they often require more backtracking, especially with complex patterns or long strings, compared to their greedy counterparts.

How does a greedy quantifier behave when there's a match conflict?

View Answer:
Interview Response: A greedy quantifier tries to match as much as possible. In case of a match conflict, it takes the longest possible match, potentially overriding smaller, valid matches.

Technical Response: In JavaScript Regular Expressions, quantifiers can be used to specify how many times a certain character or group of characters can appear in a match. These quantifiers can be greedy, lazy, or possessive. A greedy quantifier will attempt to match as many instances of a pattern as possible.

Code Example:

Let's look at an example where a greedy quantifier might cause a conflict.

Suppose we have the text:

let text = "The rain in Spain";

And we want to match anything between "The" and "Spain". A simple and naive regex to do this might be:

let regex = /The.*Spain/;

The "." is a greedy quantifier - it matches any character (.) any number of times (). The problem here is that the greedy quantifier tries to match as many characters as possible, causing it to consume more of the string than you might expect. If you use this regex on our text, it will match the whole string "The rain in Spain".

That's because the greedy quantifier ".*" matches as much of the string as possible while still allowing the regex to match. It will include the " in " part because it can. This is what is meant by a "match conflict" - you wanted to match only up to the first space, but the greedy quantifier went further because it could.

You could use a lazy quantifier to resolve this. A lazy quantifier will match as few characters as possible:

let regex = /The.*?Spain/;

This will match "The rain in Spain" - the shortest possible string that still matches the pattern. This is how you can resolve conflicts with a greedy quantifier: by making it lazy instead.


note

It's worth noting that regular expressions can become quite complex and sometimes counterintuitive, particularly when you start adding in more advanced features like lookaheads and lookbehinds. The key to understanding them is to remember that they always try to find a match, and the different quantifiers and modifiers change how they go about finding that match.


In what scenario would you prefer a lazy quantifier over a greedy one?

View Answer:
Interview Response: You'd prefer a lazy quantifier when you want to capture the smallest match possible, such as extracting data between specific characters, without consuming the entire subsequent similar patterns.

How does a lazy quantifier behave when there's a match conflict?

View Answer:
Interview Response: In case of a match conflict, a lazy quantifier takes the shortest possible match. It stops as soon as it meets the minimum requirements, avoiding larger potential matches.

Technical Response: A lazy quantifier in JavaScript regex, also known as a non-greedy quantifier, tries to match as few characters as possible. When a potential match conflict occurs, a lazy quantifier can help limit the match to the smallest acceptable result.

Code Example:

Let's consider an example.

Assume we have the following text:

let text = "<div>Content1</div><div>Content2</div>";

We want to extract the content within each <div> tag. A naive regex for this might look like:

let regex = /<div>(.*)<\/div>/;

In this regex, (.*) is a greedy quantifier. It will match as much as possible. So, when used with the text string, it will match everything from the first <div> to the last </div>, giving us "Content1</div><div>Content2".

This is a match conflict because it captures more than we intended. The conflict arises due to the greedy nature of the (.*) quantifier.

We can fix this by making the quantifier lazy, i.e., making it match as few characters as possible:

let regex = /<div>(.*?)<\/div>/;

Here, (.*?) is a lazy quantifier. It will match as few characters as possible. Now, when we use this regex with our text, it will match "Content1" and "Content2" separately, which is what we intended.


How does the "{n,}?" quantifier function in regex?

View Answer:
Interview Response: In regex, "{n,}?" is a lazy quantifier that matches at least 'n' occurrences of a pattern, but tries to match as few as possible, stopping at the first valid match.

Technical Response: In JavaScript regular expressions, `{n,}?` is a quantifier that matches at least `n` occurrences of the pattern, but as few as possible. The `{n,}` part is a greedy quantifier that would normally match `n` or more occurrences of the pattern, trying to match as many as possible. However, by adding the `?` immediately after the `{n,}`, you're making it "lazy" or "non-greedy", meaning it will match as few as possible after satisfying the `n` minimum.

Code Example:

Let's take a look at an example.

Suppose we have the following string:

let str = "1111222233334444";

And we want to match at least 2 occurrences of the number 1, but as few as possible.

We can write our regular expression as:

let regex = /1{2,}?/;

When used with our str string, it will match the first two 1s, and stop, because it satisfied the minimum (2 occurrences) and is trying to match as few as possible due to the ?.

The {n,}? quantifier is particularly useful in cases where you want to ensure a minimum number of matches, but don't want the regex to be too greedy and overmatch.


Why might we use greedy quantifiers in regex?

View Answer:
Interview Response: We might use greedy quantifiers in regex when we want to match as much text as possible, such as extracting the entire content between specific delimiters or capturing the longest patterns.

How can lazy quantifiers influence match results?

View Answer:
Interview Response: Lazy quantifiers influence match results by capturing the smallest possible match. This can yield different results compared to greedy quantifiers, especially with multiple potential matches.

How does the engine decide between a greedy and lazy match in Regex?

View Answer:
Interview Response: The engine doesn't decide between a greedy and lazy match; it's determined by the pattern. Greedy quantifiers (like *, +, {}) match as much as possible while adding "?" (like*?, +?, {}?) makes them lazy.

Can you switch a lazy quantifier to a greedy one?

View Answer:
Interview Response: Yes, you can switch a lazy quantifier to a greedy one in regex by removing the trailing question mark (?). For instance, '*?' (lazy) becomes '*' (greedy), '+?' becomes '+', and '{n,}?' becomes '{n,}'.

What's the difference between "+" and "+?" in Regex?

View Answer:
Interview Response: In regex, "+" is a greedy quantifier that matches 1 or more occurrences of the preceding element. "+?" is its lazy version, matching the fewest occurrences necessary to allow the overall match.